A million dead, 12 million refugees and wars that still going on: The terrible divorce of India and Pakistan Partition

Seventy years ago, the partition of British India into two independent nations – Hindu majority India and mainly Muslim Pakistan – provoked one of the most terrible catastrophes of a turbulent century

Shocking ethnic cleansing of thousands Muslims in Central African Republic, and the World did nothing!

Rohignya Muslim women raped by Burma soldiers and abandoned by husbands who ‘blame them’

partition_library

Seven decades ago, at the stroke of midnight on August 15, 1947, India and Pakistan gained independence, but at a terrible price.

The breaking up of British India into two independent nations – Hindu majority India and mainly Muslim Pakistan – provoked one of the most terrible catastrophes of a turbulent century.

About a million people – no one knows the number for sure – were slaughtered as Hindus and Sikhs on one side and Muslims on the other embarked on a swathe of violence. Twelve million people became refugees, many traipsing across the new international borders in seeming endless columns.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way.

India Partition

A radical Labour government was elected in Britain at the close of the Second World War, determined to grant independence to our biggest colony, India. The dashing Lord Louis Mountbatten – uncle of the Duke of Edinburgh and distant relative of the Queen – was given the role of the last Viceroy of India. His task: To organise an orderly British exit and a seamless transfer of power.

Mountbatten was a naval officer who had served as the Supreme Allied Commander, South East Asia. As befits a military man, he wanted the job done quickly. And India paid the price.

India’s main political leaders – Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Muhammad Ali Jinnah – couldn’t agree on what should follow British imperial rule. Jinnah, the founding father of Pakistan, argued that British India’s Muslim minority – about a quarter of the total population – were a nation in their own right. Nehru, independent India’s first prime minister, reluctantly agreed to the dividing of the country.

That meant dissecting two of India’s biggest provinces, Punjab and Bengal. A task that should have taken months, perhaps years, was completed in five weeks by a British lawyer, Cyril Radcliffe, who had never been to India before. And never went back.

He had to carve up India based on unreliable census returns and out-of-date maps. The news of where the new boundary would run was announced on August 17, just two days after independence.

Turmoil: Jawaharlal Nehru (left) and Mahatma Gandhi (Image: Getty)

Clashes between different religious communities intensified in the run-up to independence. It wasn’t simply spontaneous mob violence. Local politicians and gang leaders were involved, and, in the aftermath of a world war in which millions of Indians fought, there were a lot of men around with military training and army-issue weapons.

The violence spiralled out of control. Trainloads of refugees were massacred. Tens of thousand of women were abducted and raped, and then either killed or married off. Each mass slaughter prompted demands for revenge and neither the politicians nor the police were able to stop the frenzy.

Should Narendra Modi be prosecuted for his role in 2002 deadly Hindu-Muslim Gujarat Riot that killed thousands Muslims?

Muslims on India train killed ‘because they ate beef’

The steps taken to enforce law and order and deal with large numbers of refugees proved to be utterly inadequate. It was an inglorious end to imperial rule in India.

In Punjab in particular, Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs had lived together peaceably for generations.

No one expected a forced mass migration. But by the close of 1947, almost all Hindus and Sikhs in west Punjab had fled east, often encountering long processions of Muslim refugees heading in the opposite direction.

Jawaharlal Nehru addresses the nation from the ramparts of New Delhi’s Red Fort on August 15, 1947(Image: Reuters)

It was one of the biggest population movements of the modern world and a grim start to nationhood.

But within weeks, events took a turn for the worse. Britain had pulled out of the “jewel in the crown” of its empire without a final decision on who should rule the mountain kingdom of Kashmir in northern India. The maharajah, or ruler, was a Hindu. Most of his citizens were Muslims. Both India and Pakistan claimed the princely state.

By the end of October 1947, India and Pakistan were fighting over Kashmir. The conflict remains unresolved. Many Kashmiris would prefer independence.

India and Pakistan have a lot in common. They share a passion for cricket. If you speak Hindi, India’s main language, then you will understand Urdu, Pakistan’s official language. India’s Bollywood movies are big in Pakistan. Pakistani TV soaps are avidly watched in India. But the two nations have never become friends.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah with Lord and Lady Mountbatten and Fatima Jinnah (Image: Getty)

There are no direct flights between the two capitals, and India has more trade with Belgium than with Pakistan. The land that was allocated to the new Muslim nation was divided by a thousand miles of Indian territory.

In 1971, with the support of the Indian army, East Pakistan broke away to become the independent nation of Bangladesh. For many in Pakistan, it felt like a second partition.

The intense rivalry with India has destabilised Pakistan’s democracy. The army is by far the most powerful institution. And radical Islam has been able to use the war cry of saving Muslim Kashmir from Hindu India to win recruits and money. Meanwhile, India has developed into a major world power, with a robust – if flawed – democracy and a booming economy. Muslims currently account for one-in-six of India’s population, but it is forecast that it will soon be home to more Muslims than any other country.

Lord Mountbatten listens to an Indian leader from the village of Kahuta complain about rioting in 1947(Image: Getty)

Britain’s imperial history in South Asia explains the large number of migrants who came here to find work or be educated. There are almost 1.5 million people of Indian descent in Britain and slightly more whose forebears are Pakistani or Bangladeshi.

The tensions between different religious groups that flared up 70 years ago have inevitably had an impact on the outlook of migrants in Britain.

But as British Asians of all communities reflect on the immense tragedy that accompanied independence, they do so more in sadness than in anger.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s